
START HERE
I thought I was doing everything right. At 44, I had an 80% blockage in a coronary artery.
Clean diet. Training since I was 14. Wearables, sauna, cold plunge, red light, solid CGM data, home gym full of tools, a cabinet full of supplements, and thousands of dollars a year chasing the optimized life.
Every standard cardiac test came back textbook normal.
And I still ended up in a cath lab, with a stent placed in my heart.
This is the page where I tell you what happened, why the answer still isn't clean, and what I built because of it.
I'm a published clinician-scientist in epigenetics and cancer research, a Mayo Clinic certified emergency nurse, and a former supplement-industry CEO. If this picture could fool me, it can fool a lot of people.

Denial
My first reaction wasn't fear. It was certainty they had the wrong guy.
I glanced at the coronary artery scan results in the car and pulled over immediately when I saw a warning and the words flow-limiting occlusion. I had to fight for the scan, after normal labs, after a normal workup, after a clean scan at 36. Wrong chart. Wrong image. Some mix-up they'd catch before the cath lab. I had mild symptoms, just some palpitations and occasional chest pressure. The results had to be a mistake.
I held onto that story until they were threading a wire into my coronary artery and confirming that the stent needed to be placed.
You can be a clinician, you can understand the molecular details, and part of your brain will still insist this is happening to someone else.
Anger
Next came the anger, and this emotion has been harder to shake.
First at the money and the years. I had bought a sense of safety, and it turned out to be fiction. All that effort, all that spending, all that doing-it-right, and my arteries didn't get the memo.
Then came something worse: nobody could tell me why. Eight years from clean arteries to one nearly closed. The usual suspects crossed off one by one. Three cardiologists, good ones, and still no clean answer.
At one point, I felt like I was the one keeping the list of possible causes alive, what clinicians call the differential, because I was the one who had to live with whatever hidden risk factors might be missing.
Other than the stent, the plan I was handed comes down to one thing: get my LDL as low as I can. I'm doing it, and the evidence behind it is real. But my LDL was never the high number in the room, and going from a clean scan to a near-total blockage in eight years is abnormally fast for mildly high LDL alone. Something seems missing and I still don't know what.
And here's the part that still keeps me up. I don't get to know for sure that the fix is enough. I changed the things the evidence says matter, but I was already doing enough of them before the blockage showed up to know better than to treat the new plan like a promise.
So when someone tells me this will keep me off a cath table a second time, I hear a hypothesis, not a guarantee.
I refuse to bet my life on hope dressed up as certainty.
The Differential
The list of obvious explanations kept getting shorter. The answer did not.
- Lifestyle
- Sedentary lifestyleruled out
- Smokingruled out
- Junk & processed food dietruled out
- Metabolic
- Diabetes & kidney diseaseruled out
- Insulin resistanceruled out
- Thyroid dysfunctionruled out
- Abnormal CGM dataruled out
- Lipids & genetics
- Familial hypercholesterolemiaruled out
- Elevated Lp(a)ruled out
- Family history of early heart diseaseruled out
- Lifetime LDL / ApoB exposurepossible contributor, unlikely sole cause
- Systemic disease
- High systemic inflammationruled out
- Uncontrolled hypertensionruled out
- High homocysteineruled out
- Abnormal liver functionruled out
- Standard cardiac workup
- Abnormal stress testruled out
- Abnormal heart structure on echoruled out
- Abnormal 12-lead ECGruled out
- Abnormal Holter monitorruled out
Finding
An 80% blockage in a coronary artery.
Cause
Still unexplained.
I had done everything the optimization world sells. Every cause on this list came back clean. An informed reader is now asking the same thing I am: then what was it?
Acceptance & Action
So I stopped waiting for the answer to arrive.
I accepted what happened. I did not accept that “fixed” meant “understood.”
The stent opened the artery. It did not explain why a vessel that was clean at 36 was nearly closed at 44 when I was doing so many of the right things. The remaining suspects are harder to test: plaque biology, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular disease, local inflammation, clonal blood-cell changes, or a silent thrombotic event that healed into the lesion I eventually found.
That is where this stopped being a stent story and became an investigation.
I went back to what my actual training lets me do: molecular research, bioinformatics analysis of mass data, clinical interpretation, and evidence review without pretending uncertainty is the same thing as ignorance.
I started taking my own biology and the protocols I was following apart one piece at a time, out in the open. Not to sell anyone a protocol. Not to perform optimization theater. To find out what is actually true, on a case that feels unsolved, and to discard health protocols built on hype.
Where this is going
My first major health problem showed up in my heart. But the biology behind it tells a story larger than just cardiology.
But the more I dug, the less this looked like a cardiology story alone. Arteries are not plumbing. They are living tissue, shaped by inflammation, metabolism, immune signaling, blood pressure, lipids, endothelial function, and time.
That is the biology of aging at work.
It is the same kind of broken regulation I spent years studying in epigenetics and oncology, now showing up in a blood vessel. So my mission in writing and educating does not stop at the heart. It works outward, to how we evaluate any longevity claim against the actual biology of getting older, instead of against someone's confidence on a podcast.
Along the way, I'm building the process I wish existed when I was spending thousands of dollars on influencer-hyped health interventions yet had an artery slowly closing: a way to grade interventions against the hallmarks of aging, real human evidence, mechanism, safety, and marketing distortion. This is coming.
For now, this is the investigation in the open. My case is the starting point, and I have more rocks to turn.
How I keep the investigation honest
The point of this site is not to hand you my conclusions. It is to show you how I got there, so you can use the same lens on anyone, including me.
Every claim gets run through the same filters before I repeat it: who paid for the study, what the human evidence actually shows, whether the effect is large enough to matter, whether the mechanism makes biological sense, and what kind of evidence would prove me wrong.
That last part matters most. I do not want this to become a personal story looking for confirmation. I want it to be an investigation with rules.
No sponsors. No supplement line. Nothing here is for sale to the companies I write about. That is not moral purity; it is a structural choice that lets me say what the evidence says, even when it makes the wellness industry uncomfortable.

Want the longer version?
I've kept this page focused on the story. The longer version is where I lay out who I am, how I got here, and the rules I use to keep this investigation honest.
The story so far
Every post is a chapter. Read it in order, or jump into the part you need. Expand any act to see its articles.
1The EventPosts 1–5An 80% blockage at 44, and the wake-up call that started all of this.
Expand
An 80% blockage at 44, and the wake-up call that started all of this.
- I Had an 80% Coronary Blockage at 44. Every Test Said I Was Fine.
- I Aced Every Cardiac Test. I Still Had an 80% Blockage.
- The Fight for My Own Coronary Artery Scan: Why the System Fails Its Hardest Cases
- I Was Doing Almost Everything Right. It Wasn't Enough.
- The Study Used to Say LDL Doesn't Matter — Then It Got Retracted.
2The CracksPosts 6–10What standard testing missed in me, and why it's missing it in people like you.
Expand
What standard testing missed in me, and why it's missing it in people like you.
3The BiologyPosts 11–18Aging biology, the endothelium, the nitric-oxide pathway. What the body is actually doing.
Expand
Aging biology, the endothelium, the nitric-oxide pathway. What the body is actually doing.
These chapters are still being written. Subscribe and you'll get them as they land.
4The FrameworkPosts 19+A repeatable way to read claims and lower risk, instead of guessing.
Expand
A repeatable way to read claims and lower risk, instead of guessing.
These chapters are still being written. Subscribe and you'll get them as they land.
Get the signal. Skip the noise.
One evidence-based read a week. The whole verdict, never truncated, never sponsored. What a thing is, which part of aging it touches, what the human data actually shows, and where I landed.
For people who want to go deeper than the weekly read, I'm building something more. More on that when it's ready.
I had advantages most people never get. The training to read my own scans. Access to the best cardiologists in the country. The time and the money to chase an answer. And it still almost got me.
Not everyone gets those advantages. Everyone deserves the same information. That's the whole reason this exists.

